CLICK HERE FOR GOOGLE ARCHIVED COPY THAT
 
APPEARS EXACTLY AS IT IS BELOW

From: Andrew Gierth <andrew@erlenstar.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Attention: Andrew Gierth, Spam Clarification?
Date: 07 Aug 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <87u2qcm9fn.fsf@erlenstar.demon.co.uk>
References: <37ae947f.227360250@news.supernews.com> <37AA3524.9CC254C5@psicounsel.com> <37ba560b.89577481@news.supernews.com>
X-Mayan-Date: Long count = 12.19.6.7.13; tzolkin = 5 Ben; haab = 1 Yaxkin
X-Complaints-To: andrew@erlenstar.demon.co.uk
Organization: disorganised
X-Attribution: AG
X-Pgp-0x0E9FFBE9: 87 25 7F 14 41 24 B3 51  E0 19 8B DE 49 74 0C 29
X-P-Persistent-Headers: are a bad idea.
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
X-Post-Filter: postfilter v0.6 alpha

>>>>> "Bob" == Bob Officer <bobo@NOSPAM.vornet.com> writes:

 [lots of stuff snipped]

You'll probably find things easier to understand if you realise
that the examples of different types of substantively identical
messages given in the thresholds FAQ are just that, _examples_.

The definitive test is "construes the same message".

--
Andrew.