SEC 1 of 4
2 of 4
3 of 4 SECTIONS
Here, in part 11, we report the results of
our attempt,
and, as we find so seldom, in that geographical
region known as USENET, that most scarce...
Intelligent Life On the Net
===========================================================
From: Flagship1 of the Paranormal <flagship@epix.net>
Newsgroups: alt.paranormal, alt.freaks,
alt.paranet.paranormal, alt.out-of-body,
alt.paranet.skeptic, sci.skeptic,
alt.witchcraft, alt.romance.teen,
alt.teens, alt.teens.16-18
Subject: Just Quit Wasting your Time With
Skeptics!
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 19:41:03 -0400
[BRACKETS -- MY COMMENTS---BDK]
[I am going to quote the parts of this post that
1. Make sense
2. Are Honest
3. Are Civil
...and leave out irrelevant parts, and parts
that
do not fit the above criteria.---BDK]
Just Quit Wasting your Time With Skeptics!
[Excellent idea--as one should not waste time
with anything
that shows few signs of a probability
of enjoyment,
helping oneself or others---BDK]
If you are one who keeps writing to these
People you are only Wasting your Time. They
do not care...
[Well, if one is attempting to convert "skeptics"
I agree,
and that makes sense, that they, for
the most part,
"do not care..." ---BDK]
So Why don't we all just get
together and Shun The Skeptics!!!
[That's a good idea. Let's *not* post in sci.skeptic
to seek them out, either. ---BDK]
...focusing more attention on the
People Who <snip> [find paranormal phenomena
and New Age Philosophy important---BDK]
Rather then Those who Do not.
[That's another good idea---BDK]
[However, I believe that, without necessarily
arguing with "skeptics," the mentality of such people should
be exposed
when they choose to post in paranormal-spiritual
newsgroups.
My series "Intelligent Life..." and "sense-honesty-civility"
enable this exposure to continue as long
as their presence
is noted in these newsgroups, without argument,
as they are merely repeated threads and comments---BDK]
[When so-called "skeptics" post in newsgroups
like
alt.paranet.ufo and alt.paranormal, and their
posts lack
sense, honesty, and civility, perhaps the
exposure will
give them incentive to communicate amongst
themselves,
in newsgroups such as sci.skeptic---BDK]
============================================================
The Newsreader FORTE AGENT has a capability
for screening
all writing out, except for a select few.
You can actually select *to read* the writing
of
certain authors, and automatically screen
out the rest.
You may also read all but certain writers.
Only the postings that you want to read are
placed in
your computer memory, and you can read and
respond while
not connected to the INTERNET.
The above is a perfect way to avoid wasting
time with UNintelligent life on the Net. You can rely upon our force
of cesspool sifters to help you know who
to allow into your
USENET world.
Stay tuned to our series for a longer, more
complete,
Now and then, a "skeptic" will post in paranormal
Enter into your FORTE AGENT, newsreader: author:
========================================================
Join us again as we make our increasingly
difficult
It's there, but you just have to search.
I notice, at times, the same author can place
signs
========================================================
As we enter into this realm that is sometimes
called "cyberspace," we look at the life forms in this part of
"Intelligent Life On the Net"
Now and then, there is such life, and we will
report it
Yes, folks, anyone, and I do mean *anyone*,
can post to USENET, or put writing up on the WEB and in the search engines.
There's no screening process, as the sickest,
most stupid, immature, and fanatical liars write, and most of it is
You have to learn to sift through it, wipe
off the filfth
HONEST
CIVIL
and
MAKES SENSE
It's difficult, and there is value on the
INTERNET, but one must search with caution.
Today, in part 12, we report the results of
our attempt,
Intelligent Life On the Net
===========================================================
From: Flagship1 of the Paranormal <flagship@epix.net>
First Flagship wrote:
> > The Spirits are out there,
> > Please Note That I have copied these pictures
from another
<snip>
> > You just have to get used to it the Spirits
are
John, the "skeptic" wrote:
> Look Flagship1, a photograph can be
I agree -- with your argument, not your view
that
> John T.
Okay, here's where I side with the "skeptics."
When I say I side with you all, it does not
mean I side
You made sense.
============================================================
The Newsreader FORTE AGENT has a capability
for screening
You may also read all but certain writers.
Only the postings that you want to read are
placed in
The above is a perfect way to avoid wasting
time with UNintelligent life on the Net. You can rely upon our force
Stay tuned to our series for a longer, more
complete,
Now and then, a "skeptic" will post in paranormal
Enter into your FORTE AGENT, newsreader: author:
========================================================
Join us again as we make our increasingly
difficult
It's there, but you just have to search.
I notice, at times, the same author can place
signs
========================================================
As we enter into this realm that is sometimes
called "cyberspace," we look at the life forms in this part of
"Intelligent Life On the Net"
Now and then, there is such life, and we will
report it
Yes, folks, anyone, and I do mean *anyone*,
can post to USENET, or put writing up on the WEB and in the search engines.
There's no screening process, as the sickest,
most stupid, immature, and fanatical liars write, and most of it is
You have to learn to sift through it, wipe
off the filfth
HONEST
CIVIL
and
MAKES SENSE
It's difficult, and there is value on the
INTERNET, but one must search with caution.
Today, in part 12, we report the results of
our attempt,
Intelligent Life On the Net
===========================================================
From: Flagship1 of the Paranormal <flagship@epix.net>
First Flagship wrote:
> > The Spirits are out there,
> > Please Note That I have copied these pictures
from another
<snip>
> > You just have to get used to it the Spirits
are
John, the "skeptic" wrote:
> Look Flagship1, a photograph can be
I agree -- with your argument, not your view
that
> John T.
Okay, here's where I side with the "skeptics."
When I say I side with you all, it does not
mean I side
You made sense.
============================================================
The Newsreader FORTE AGENT has a capability
for screening
You may also read all but certain writers.
Only the postings that you want to read are
placed in
The above is a perfect way to avoid wasting
time with UNintelligent life on the Net. You can rely upon our force
Stay tuned to our series for a longer, more
complete,
Now and then, a "skeptic" will post in paranormal
Enter into your FORTE AGENT, newsreader: author:
========================================================
Join us again as we make our increasingly
difficult
It's there, but you just have to search.
I notice, at times, the same author can place
signs
========================================================
As we enter into this realm that is sometimes called "cyberspace," we
look at the life forms in this part of space, and then descending in our
spacecraft and
"Intelligent Life On the Net"
Now and then, there is such life, and we will report it when we find
it, and then, also, as we report what we come across in our attempt, showing
the UN-intelligent life.
Yes, folks, anyone, and I do mean *anyone*, can post to USENET, or put
writing up on the WEB and in the search engines.
There's no screening process, as the sickest, most stupid, immature,
and fanatical liars write, and most of it is
You have to learn to sift through it, wipe off the filfth
HONEST
CIVIL
and
MAKES SENSE
It's difficult, and there is value on the INTERNET, but one must search
with caution.
Today, in part 13, we report the results of our attempt,
Intelligent
Life On the Net
today, we report the UN-intelligent Life on the Net,
and of the 3
SENSE
...that are so often lacking. Here, in this example, we see a
lack of sense.
Subject: Re: Important CULT ® Research
The writer, as signified above, does not reveal either a name or an
actual Internet Service Provider. Though e-mail may be sent to him,
and he will receive it, it is "via."
<snip>
><snip> the acceptance...the skeptics would demonstrate
You, evidently, believe that there is no evidence of PSI outside the
community of paranormal enthusiasts. I've given references to unbiased
research in posts, as shown below:
Subject:
Re: I'm Psychic, But Please Don't Believe It
<snip>
You "EMPATH" wrote:
> What I recognize as important, is true research.
Do you find any of the research, referenced below, valuable?
http://www.psicounsel.com/scistudy.html
> ...true scientifically accurate research.
Well, I did make reference to Brian Zeiler's posts, and copied
...and see references to scientific research.
Could that be the "scientifically accurate research" you
> My goal is <snip> [to] ...truly search for the sources and
answers.
Ah ha, well then go ahead and start searching, as referenced
http://www.psicounsel.com/scistudy.html
http://www.psicounsel.com/scistudy.html
It would make sense to examine it, and decide for yourself
Or, you could have disagreed without examining it, stating:
1. I know there is no such thing, without examination
Whether you agreed or not, the above statements would have
From: empath@psynet.spamblock.net (EMPATH)
/snip\
>Again, you are off the point. Your statement about "paranormal
>>I acknowledged research outside the circle of paranormal
[BDK--There had been no acknowledgement, only denial of "research outside
the circle of paranormal enthusiasts." Complete references of past posts
usually may be obtained at http://www.dejanews.com]
The Newsreader FORTE AGENT has a capability for screening
You may also read all but certain writers.
Only the postings that you want to read are placed in
The above is a perfect way to avoid wasting time with UNintelligent
life on the Net. You can rely upon our force of cesspool sifters
to help you know who to allow into your
Stay tuned to our series for a longer, more complete,
Now and then, a "skeptic" will post in paranormal
Enter into your FORTE AGENT, newsreader: author:
========================================================
Join us again as we make our increasingly difficult
It's there, but you just have to search.
I notice, at times, the same author can place signs
CLICK HERE FOR
PAGE FOUR
list in the future, but for now, your recommended
*allow to read* list is:
flagship@epix.net
johnf@melbpc.org.au
Bruce Daniel Kettler
Charles Gregory
(there are more, read posts
and decide who they are)
newsgroups, and make sense, be honest, and
civil.
That is so seldom that when it does happen,
it's
worthy of note, as I did in part 12 of this
series.
flagship@epix.net with your "add watch filter"
and
"retrieve body immediately" commands.
At the bottom
of your list, have a "kill" for "author:
*" and
"subject *" -- which "kills" all messages
except
those you want to retrieve. This feature
only works
in the paid-for version of FORTE AGENT.
search for "Intelligent Life on the Net."
of intelligent life, and other times, signs
of
unintelligent life -- depending upon their
mood,
I guess.
space, and then descending in our spacecraft
and
operating our sensors, we search and note
that, though
often the search is vain, through the many
lifeforms
with abundant insanity, illogic, falsity,
and hostility,
now and then we find...
when we find it, and then, also, as we report
what we
come across in our attempt, showing the UN-intelligent
life.
garbage.
and get rid of the stink, and find what is...
and, as we find so seldom, in that geographical
region known as USENET, that most scarce...
Subject: Re: The Spirits are out there,
I Found Pictures to Prove it!!!!
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 1997 21:37:56 -0600
John Teggatz jhntggtz@execpc.com is where
this
intelligent life on the Net comes from, today.
He is a "skeptic" and he wrote:
> > I Found Pictures to Prove it!!!!
> > source and by no means do I claim them
as my own!
> > The source where I have found these Images
is
> > listed at the Bottom of this Article.
> > all around us so why don't you Quit being
a
> > skeptic and Start believing?
<snip>
> (and often are) faked... I work with
> Adobe Photoshop most of the day for
> my job, and... Oh, never mind.
there are no spirits. BDK
with your position about spirits. It
does not mean
I am saying there are no spirits. It
means I side
with your argument, your logic.
You were honest.
You were civil.
all writing out, except for a select few.
You can actually select *to read* the writing
of
certain authors, and automatically screen
out the rest.
your computer memory, and you can read and
respond while
not connected to the INTERNET.
of cesspool sifters to help you know who
to allow into your
USENET world.
list in the future, but for now, your recommended
*allow to read* list is:
flagship@epix.net
johnf@melbpc.org.au
Bruce Daniel Kettler
sir@srv.net
Charles Gregory
jhntggtz@execpc.com (a "skeptic"
worthy of your
reading)
(there are more, read posts
and decide who they are)
newsgroups, and make sense, be honest, and
civil.
That is seldom, and certainly worth mentioning.
jhntggtz@execpc.com with your "add watch
filter" and
"retrieve body immediately" commands.
At the bottom
of your list, have a "kill" for "author:
*" and
"subject *" -- which "kills" all messages
except
those you want to retrieve. This feature
only works
in the paid-for version of FORTE AGENT.
search for "Intelligent Life on the Net."
of intelligent life, and other times, signs
of
unintelligent life -- depending upon their
mood,
I guess.
space, and then descending in our spacecraft
and
operating our sensors, we search and note
that, though
often the search is vain, through the many
lifeforms
with abundant insanity, illogic, falsity,
and hostility,
now and then we find...
when we find it, and then, also, as we report
what we
come across in our attempt, showing the UN-intelligent
life.
garbage.
and get rid of the stink, and find what is...
and, as we find so seldom, in that geographical
region known as USENET, that most scarce...
Subject: Re: The Spirits are out there,
I Found Pictures to Prove it!!!!
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 1997 21:37:56 -0600
John Teggatz jhntggtz@execpc.com is where
this
intelligent life on the Net comes from, today.
He is a "skeptic" and he wrote:
> > I Found Pictures to Prove it!!!!
> > source and by no means do I claim them
as my own!
> > The source where I have found these Images
is
> > listed at the Bottom of this Article.
> > all around us so why don't you Quit being
a
> > skeptic and Start believing?
<snip>
> (and often are) faked... I work with
> Adobe Photoshop most of the day for
> my job, and... Oh, never mind.
there are no spirits. BDK
with your position about spirits. It
does not mean
I am saying there are no spirits. It
means I side
with your argument, your logic.
You were honest.
You were civil.
all writing out, except for a select few.
You can actually select *to read* the writing
of
certain authors, and automatically screen
out the rest.
your computer memory, and you can read and
respond while
not connected to the INTERNET.
of cesspool sifters to help you know who
to allow into your
USENET world.
list in the future, but for now, your recommended
*allow to read* list is:
flagship@epix.net
johnf@melbpc.org.au
Bruce Daniel Kettler
sir@srv.net
Charles Gregory
jhntggtz@execpc.com (a "skeptic"
worthy of your
reading)
(there are more, read posts
and decide who they are)
newsgroups, and make sense, be honest, and
civil.
That is seldom, and certainly worth mentioning.
jhntggtz@execpc.com with your "add watch
filter" and
"retrieve body immediately" commands.
At the bottom
of your list, have a "kill" for "author:
*" and
"subject *" -- which "kills" all messages
except
those you want to retrieve. This feature
only works
in the paid-for version of FORTE AGENT.
search for "Intelligent Life on the Net."
of intelligent life, and other times, signs
of
unintelligent life -- depending upon their
mood,
I guess.
operating our sensors, we search and note that, though often the search
is vain, through the many life-forms with abundant insanity, illogic, falsity,
and hostility, now and then we find...
garbage.
and get rid of the stink, and find what is...
and, as so seldom find intelligence, in that geographical
region known as USENET, that most scarce...
HONESTY
CIVILITY
From: empath@psynet.spamblock.net (EMPATH)
Date: 1997/09/09
Message-Id: <5v3736$j16@sdrn.zippo.com>
Newsgroups: alt.paranormal
This note does not concern direct evidence of unintelligent life on
the Net.
>if research data came from the sciences outside the
>community of paranormal enthusiasts. <snip>
From:
Bruce Daniel Kettler <dan@psicounsel.com>
Date:
1997/08/21
Message-Id: <33FC6B97.5B65AB6F@psicounsel.com>
them to this newsgroup, alt.paranormal, not long ago.
Readers may access
are referring to?
below:
It does not make sense to assert a position, imply a need for evidence
to the contrary, and refuse to examine that evidence in a posted reply
to your assertion. The evidence is in the reference which follows,
that I'd made. Our posts were an ongoing dialogue.
if you agreed that the research came from the "sciences
outside the community of paranormal enthusiasts."
2. I don't know if there is such a thing, but there
probably isn't, so I won't waste my
time
been been more intellectually palatable to an intelligent
person.
Newsgroups: alt.paranormal, alt.fan.art-bell, alt.fan.bruce-kettler
Subject: Re: BDK Research Pages Inadequate
Date: 1 Oct 1997 02:50:12 -0700
Message-ID: <60t6ck$srr@sdrn.zippo.com>
References: <60i6ra$ebl@sdrn.zippo.com>
<342CFF52.2B31@psicounsel.com>
<342e0ee2.2545123@snews.zippo.com>
<342FF402.E6A5B2AA@psicounsel.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p-389.newsdawg.com
In article <342FF402.E6A5B2AA@psicounsel.com>, Bruce says...
>enthusiasts" being the only one's to have done research is proven
>incorrect. After you, allegedly, looked at the pages [http://www
>psicounsel.com/scistudy.html -- BDK] you again stated it.
>>enthusiasts. /snip\
all writing out, except for a select few.
You can actually select to read the writing of
certain authors, and automatically screen out the rest.
your computer memory, and you can read and respond while
not connected to the INTERNET.
USENET world.
list in the future, but for now, your recommended
*allow to read* list is:
flagship@epix.net
johnf@melbpc.org.au
Bruce Daniel Kettler
sir@srv.net
Charles Gregory
jhntggtz@execpc.com (a "skeptic"
worthy of your
reading)
(there are more, read posts
and decide who they are)
newsgroups, and make sense, be honest, and civil.
That is seldom, and certainly worth mentioning.
jhntggtz@execpc.com with your "add watch filter" and
"retrieve body immediately" commands. At the bottom
of your list, have a "kill" for "author: *" and
"subject *" -- which "kills" all messages except
those you want to retrieve. This feature only works
in the paid-for version of FORTE AGENT.
search for "Intelligent Life on the Net."
of intelligent life, and other times, signs of
unintelligent life -- depending upon their mood,
I guess.