Who is a skeptic?
I totally agree
with the late Professor Truzzi that a skeptic is one who ‘doubts’
NOT one who ‘denies.’ Why did the materialists unfairly
hijack the word 'skeptic' to describe themselves?
OPEN MINDED SKEPTICS: are those
(like me- I cannot be anything else) who question, doubt, investigate,
query and do not come to any dogmatic conclusions until a phenomenon
is investigated properly, empirically and impartially.
CLOSED MINDED SKEPTICS: those relatively
few debunkers who technically are NOT 'skeptics' but negatively
minded materialists whose conclusions are based on their own negative
defeatist prejudice. Some are motivated by career promotions,
money, power, domination, for funding from materialists or for
other material self interest. Read
CRITICAL THINKING... It is very important to keep on asking questions,
to doubt, to be open to new ideas, new concepts, newly discovered
phenomenon - especially if any or all of these are empirically
presented. Scientists and psychic researchers who accept the evidence
for the afterlife and other evidence for psi not only apply 'critical
thinking' but have to apply strict 'scientific method.'
biggest baloney $1m offer by the
closed minded skeptic in U.S. history!
Read why nobody can win
the biggest baloney offer in history made by materialist, closed
minded skeptic J. Zwinge Randi - JR. Why is it that gifted psychics
are obtaining information with amazing odds of one in 3 trillion
- and more! (see below) that their information is being obtained
by chance and yet this JR is actively preventing a public testing
of these gifted psychics? Yes, you are right, because the offer
is absolute rubbish! Read more...
COWARDICE PUSHED TO ITS EXTREME?
Why is it that J Zwinge Randi (JR) refused to meet gifted psychic
Chris Robinson LIVE on television? Chris Robinson was successfully
investigated by scientists and tested on television for his psychic
gifts. Chris Robinson stated that he is willing to demonstrate
his psychic skills LIVE to millions of viewers - NOT be examined
PRIVATELY by JR where JR could manipulate circumstances to adversely
affect Chris Robinson. Why is JR refusing to meet Chris LIVE on
television? Is JR a coward? Or is this closed minded skeptic's
offer a bogus offer, full of deceit and full of wilful misrepresentations?
JR 'begs' for money for his 'charity' from the Americans and others
... ought not there be accountability to test if what he is doing
is legitimate? Read more...
The 'EXPERIMENTER EFFECT.' The
negatively minded skeptical experimenter will obtain negative
results in psychic experiments notwithstanding other empiricists
considered to be 'neutral' obtain positive results doing the same
experiments. This is most relevant for those who genuinely want
to test gifted psychics. See a most interesting example of the
EXPERIMENTER EFFECT > Dr. Marilyn Schlitz neutral experimenter
obtained positive results and Dr Richard Wiseman, who has a historical
track record of finding against psychics - doing the same experiment
as Dr Schlitz consistently obtained negative results - see the
the University of Freiburg Studies and Mick O’Neil’s
analysis of Wiseman’s experimental style - last time was
seen on: http://www.forteantimes.com/artic/espcrit/espcrit.html
ABSOLUTE EMPIRICAL PROOF OF PRECOGNITION! AGAIN CLOSED
MINDED SKEPTICS FAIL TO REBUT....
In the laboratory, comparisons (meta-analysis) of 309
studies of precognition (telling the future) in the laboratory
have demonstrated that the subjects showed their ability to see
the future against odds of TEN MILLION BILLION BILLION to ONE
that they could have done it by chance. This INEVITABLY means
that the information did NOT come by chance and that psychic phenomenon
of recognition is real, repeatable and testable! See Dean Radin’s
CONSCIOUS UNIVERSE 114. I've asked the materialists to rebut these
experiments - funny how materialists, closed minded skeptics CANNOT
cope with 'scientific' proof or with those who have the skills
to present empirical evidence for psi/afterlife evidence!
MATHEMATICS PROVES THE AFTERLIFE!
John Edward has really puzzled
the closed minded skeptics. I am taping John Edward's CROSSING
OVER everyday - it is being shown two and at times three times
a day on FOXTEL - and some 600 television stations inside and
outside the United States. I suggest that the debunkers obtain
the services of a neutral, independent professional statistician
and ask him/her what the mathematical probability is of John Edward
obtaining the information he claims he is getting by chance. Then
ask the statistician to take into consideration a cumulative month's
viewing: the result? Unequivocally, trillions to one! Translated,
this means John Edward IS getting his information from those who
crossed over. This evidence is consistent with 23 other areas
of evidence for the afterlife.
-- Victor Zammit, Feb 2003
million dollars is offered to any closed minded
skeptic who can rebut the existing evidence for
the afterlife. Read
skeptics and other materialists: some of those whom
are psychologists, ex-magicians, biologists, physicists
and others, have miserably failed to technically
rebut the expressly stated evidence for the existence
of the afterlife.
By contrast, more scientists,
more physicists, more psychologists and more people
in the professions and others are conceding the
empirical evidence for the afterlife is just irrefutable.
THE closed minded skeptic clock now:
The Miami materialist JR Clock began in April 2001!! Since
then this materialist, closed minded skeptic has refused to rebut
my objective evidence for the afterlife. My evidence is EXPRESSLY
STATED - 23 areas of evidence for the existence of the afterlife.
I will be adding another TWO areas of objective evidence in the
New Year - the modern 'new scientists' argument for the afterlife
- QUANTUM MECHANICS and MATHEMATICS.
The 'TWISTED SPOON' award for the year goes
to the greatest closed minded skeptical coward materialist in
the world - the negatively entrenched defeatist and a loser, D
Hawley/B Williams from Australia. This coward materialist Hawley(some
say he is the same negative person as B Williams) who shows he
has no substance has attacked me using 'dirty' language without
rebutting any one of the 23 different areas of my objective evidence
for the afterlife- intentionally and blatantly violating the rules
of debate. Colossal cowards! The technical onus is on anyone who
does not accept the expressly stated afterlife empirical objective
evidence for the existence of the afterlife - some of it accepted
by the Courts- to rebut it - not to descend to name-calling and
the idiocy of gutter level negative 'descriptive' scurrilous expression.
DEPENDENT VARIABLE? When J Zwinge
R who claims to have been a stage magician emailed me a couple
of years ago he implied that he was qualified to do experiments
and test psychics using empirical methods. I tested him by asking
him what was a 'dependent variable' in empirical testing. He said
he would reply to me. Two years later, I am still waiting for