Intelligent Life on the Net
Latest Update June 2005
|As we enter into this realm that is sometimes
called "cyberspace," we look at the life forms in this part of space, and
then descending in our spacecraft and operating our sensors, we search
and note that, though often the search is vain, and though there are many
life forms with abundant insanity, illogic,
falsehood, and hostility, now and then we find...
"Intelligent Life On the Net"
For postings found on this and other pages of this URL which are noted as having DEJA links, go to and enter the "From:" address in the space designated author. Also, enter one of the newsgroups shown in the message header. Then, look for the correct message. has refined their search procedure.
has acquired the archives of DEJA,
and they have restored user access to the archives for posts over a decade
old.. For more information, click
here. Message ID numbers can be entered to find posts in GOOGLE.
These 5 people bring unintelligent life to the net. Elsewhere on
these pages, I show examples of the much sought-after "Intelligent
Life On the Net." Click at the following links for examples of this
lack of intelligence. I've isolated this list from the remainder on these
pages because these are the most obsessive, so they have been afforded
the greater space and detailed descriptions. One advantage the reader
may gain from reading this is the study of unusual, and complex people.Ken Kizer (aka "CFA") If anyone were to ask me who on these pages shows the least
intelligence, my answer would be Ken Kizer, (aka "CFA") The
slang expressions "suck-up" and "sell-out" come to mind when I
remember him. He evades. and is deceptive. Logic seems
to be something foreign to him. His view is myopic.
Del Robert Mulroy (aka "Neykomi Lee") -- troubled, self-tortured, deluded, and obsessed habitual liar
John Fitzsimons -- obsessed "control-freak" -- evasive and unable to communicate directly
Bob Officer -- "control-freak" and non-stop "attack machine" for the skepticult --
seems psychologically unable to write anything that is true
Widdershins (probably a pseudonym) This one exhibits writings of hatred, and is a bully.
He shows blind dedication to his cause. His writing shows that he
does, indeed, want pro-paranormalists to stop posting in alt.paranormal.
Though he demonstrates deception, a large amount of that is self-deception.
Now and then we come across such intelligent life, and we will report it when we find it.
Sense - Honesty - Civility
How and Why to Flame
Phil Harrison 1
Dan Pressnell 32
Empath 12 3 45 6 This shows unusually talented ability with deception.
Jon Walsh 1 See what Walsh calls "pornography." Walsh wrote that Art Bell laughed at me, Dan Kettler.
Sherilyn (aka Tony Sidaway)12
Mutt 116 17
Kristine Campbell 1
For those who say this is about "skeptics," there are examples of some people who have written as proponents of astrology or the paranormal. No, it's not about "skeptics." It's about Sense-honesty-Civility and Intelligent Life On the Net.
Mutt 1 -- Self-styled "expert," "Mutt" discusses parapsychology, astrology, etc. The setting is a coffee shop and bookstore. Read this if you want something to laugh about.
Mutt 16 -- "Mutt" discusses the nature of belief, and about people he assumes are too sure about their beliefs. he also writes about debate.
Mutt 17 -- "Mutt" flames people.
Bob Officer The favorite subject of this person is "spam." It's not real spam. Evidence shows it's more like some illusion of it. He denigrates the character of proponents. He's a Skepticult member.
Kristine Campbell 1 -- She raves about the accused, alleged, "charlatan" who would dare to advertise psychic services on the Internet. This is good study material. She has posted with the a slightly different e-mail
address, but may be located via GOOGLE by entering
"Kristine Campbell." She has posted in alt.fan.art-bell,
"EMPATH" - 1 through 6 - puzzling but interesting character to study
THIS IS SECTION 1 of 4 SECTIONS
SECTION 2 of 4 SECTIONS
SECTION 3 of 4 SECTIONS
SECTION 4 of 4 SECTIONS
There's no screening process, as the sickest, most stupid, immature, and fanatical liars write, and most of it is garbage.
You have to learn to sift through it, wipe off the filth, and get rid of the stink, and find what is...
It's difficult, and there is value on the INTERNET, but one must search with caution. and, as we find so seldom, in that geographical region known as USENET, AND the WORLD WIDE WEB, that most scarce...
Intelligent Life On the Net
Find out about how spirituality, the paranormal, and USENET interrelate.
Join us again as we make our increasingly difficult search for "Intelligent Life on the Net."
It's there, but you just have to search.
I notice, at times, the same author can place signs of intelligent life, and other times, signs of unintelligent life -- depending upon their mood.
Here, in part 1, we report our attempt, and, instead, the stupidity we found while searching for,
"Intelligent Life On the Net?
Subject: Re: The Lemming Conspiracy
(was Re: I'm OFFICIALLY a member.)
From: Sam <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Then, there's the lynching mob, "oh, but we are
> all out here, in the woods, and we unanimously agree,
> so we must be right,
The above, obviously, especially in context with the reminder of my writing, to people capable of thinking, meansthe majority is not necessarily right. It does not meanthe majority is necessarily wrong.
I don't believe the writing below, a reaction to the above, reveals a capacity for rational thought.
"But sometimes the majority is right...
the earth is round...Tyson bit
Holyfield...the stars shine at night....
and you have the intelligence of a
"get well soon"
Yes, anyone who writes such stupidity should call them self...
...as with such writing, why would a person let anyone know who they really are?
As we enter into this realm that is sometimes called "cyberspace," we look at the life forms in this part of space, and then descending in our space craft and operating our sensors, we search and note that, though often the search is vain, through the many life forms with abundant insanity, illogic, falsehood, and hostility, now and then we find:
"Intelligent Life On the Net?
Now and then, there is such life, and we will report it when we find it, and then, also, we will report what we come across it in our attempt.
Here, in part 2, we report our attempt, and, though it has not been easy or often, here we have found that rare...
Intelligent Life On the Net
From: email@example.com (John Fitzsimons)
Subject: Re: I'm on the fence...
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 1997 21:46:33 GMT
On Thu, 26 Jun 1997 03:37:56 GMT, firstname.lastname@example.org
(Keith A. McGuinness) wrote:
< snip >
> <snip> No-one has YET demonstrated that
> they have the basic abilities required to, for example,
> predict the future.
John, in an intelligent manner, reports the following:
>>You are obviously talking from your own experience.
>>If you had done some serious investigations then you
>>would find that some people do indeed predict the future.
>>If you had said that nobody had shown
>>themselves to be 100% accurate 100% of the
>>time then I suspect that there would be many
>>people here who may well agree with you.
>>I was discussing psychic channels. I suspect that
>>you were discussing a totally different topic.
Yes, John, there is intelligent life on the NET, after
,-._|\ John Fitzsimons - Melbourne, Australia.
/ Oz \ email@example.com, Fidonet 3:632/309
In part 3, we report our attempt, and, thoughit has not been easy or often, here we have found that rare...
"Intelligent Life On the Net?
Here, along that geographical section amongst the so-called "skeptics" we have dug deeply, and we have searched among the life-forms, and actually found...
"Intelligent Life On the Net
From: skeptix@CYBERWARPED.COM (Brant Watson)
Subject: Re: ley lines in Scotland.U.K.
Date: 28 Jun 1997 17:47:10 -0700
John Mcgowan wrote:
> The Book I found says a Ley Line is an invisible source of
> energy that comes from on high, makes a 90 Degree turn when
> it touches the ground, and may proceed along the surface for
> as many as twenty miles before entering the earth. The Book
> is called `Dowsing for Everyone", by Harvey Howells.
I would love to ask the author:
1) Since the earth rotates on its axis, revolves around
the sun, and revolves around the center of the galaxy,
which has its own proper motion with respect to other
galaxies, how can any cosmic influence cause permanent
ley lines on the earth's surface?
Yes, there, above, is an intelligent question. [bdk]
Here, in part 4, we report our attempt, and, as we find most often, in that geographical region, known as the WORLD WIDE WEB, though that much travelled gateway known as a SEARCH ENGINE, the abundant...
"UNIntelligent Life On the Net?
Here, in this subarea, amongst the so-called "skeptics" we have dug deeply, and we have searched among the life-forms, and actually, on INFOSEEK, (www.infoseek.com) found this stupidity...
Search for Bruce Daniel Kettler's Weird
Usenet Posts Just click on the button,
settle back with some popcorn, and enjoy
the comedy. (If you find it funny that
one person can be so hateful.) A really
funny set of posts is where BDK ...
The above is by, none other than our the terror of alt.paranormal, the SKEP-TI-CULT fanatic, himself.
Dan Pressnell firstname.lastname@example.org
who many have asked, for years actually,
to just, please, go away.
He's prime killfile material, in that people
set their newsreaders so they will never see
what he has written.
Here's another from this fanatic:
Skeptics -- what they do and why; A really stupid site to visit! Visit one of the stupidest sites on the web. Skeptics -- what they do and why. An exercise in supreme silliness by Bruce ...
Read the above again. Doesn't that remind you of the writing of a child?
If you want to know what is UN-INTELLIGENT about that, well, for one, it's the fact that it arouses curiousityabout my site, and there in INFOSEEK, is thereference to the site he wrote of.
and the information on the site, shows exactly what motivates people, like himself, to do what he does at his site -- write derogitory statements about other people who
disagree with him.
INFOSEEK advertises "Proof of Intelligent Life on the Net" but they are a SEARCH ENGINE that accepts, automatically, entries from silly people like Dan Pressnell.
There's no-one around, at 4 AM, when the fingers of a snickering Dan Pressnell tap out the dirty work on INFOSEEK, as all that he writes get's placed, and like USENET, no-one decides if it's in bad taste, or lacks sense.
The other SEARCH ENGINES, as a whole, examine the material before placing it. They exercise judgement and good taste. That, it would seem, is why Dan Pressnell cannot place this ridiculous writing on the other Search Engines.
I have my writing, however, on the other SEARCH ENGINES, as I have genuine services offered, not hate literature.
In part 5, we report our attempt, and, as we find most often, in that geographical region known as the WORLD WIDE WEB, though that much travelled gateway known as a SEARCH ENGINE, the abundant...
"UNIntelligent Life On the Net?
The examples of UNintelligent life on the net, include
examples of the lack of:
...and I reserve the right to be uncivil to those who rant and rave against me with lies and nasty remarks. There is an art to that, called flaming.
Here, in this sub-area, amongst the so-called "skeptics" we have dug deeply, and we have searched among the life-forms, and actually, on INFOSEEK, (www.infoseek.com) found this stupidity...
INFOSEEK advertises "Proof of Intelligent Life on the Net" but they are a SEARCH ENGINE that accepts, automatically, entries from silly people like Jon Walsh.
There's no-one around, at 4 AM, when the fingers of a snickering fool do their dirty work on INFOSEEK, as all that he writes get's placed, and like USENET, no-one decides if it's in bad taste, or lacks sense.
As we enter into this realm that is sometimes called "cyberspace," we look at the life forms in this part of space, and then descending in our spacecraft and operating our sensors, we search and note that, though often the search is vain, through the many lifeforms with abundant insanity, illogic, falsity, and hostility, now and then we find...
"Intelligent Life On the Net?"
Now and then, there is such life, and we will report it when we find it, and then, also, we will report what we come across in our attempt.
Today, in part 5, we report our attempt, and, as we find most often, in that geographical region known as the WORLD WIDE WEB, though that much travelled gateway known
as a SEARCH ENGINE, the abundant...
"UN-Intelligent Life On the Net?
The examples of UN-Intelligent life on the net, include
examples of the lack of:
and I reserve the right to be uncivil to those who rant
and rave against me with lies and nasty remarks.
SKEP-TI-CULT Welcomes you!!!
Kick back and take a shot at unarmed fools.
Its fun for the whole family!Even the kids'll
have a blast whacking a loony.
The above is a good example of the lack of intelligence and maturity on the INTERNET.
To find the above, just enter "Bruce Daniel Kettler" in
Since this is a criticism of the site, and the quotes are minimal, there's no copyright infringement. It's considered "fair use policy," in copyright law.
"Our mission began when one Bruce Daniel Kettler, an insane psychic "business man," decided to share his wild rants and spamulent advertisements with the entire usenet community."The above quote, and use of the word "insane" is slander.
"...advertised 900 # type psychic
services to lonely teenagers"
The above quote is a lie, as I have no 900 line services. I do offer telephone services, but they are hardly what could be called a "psychic hot line," or 900 line. I realize that reprehensible behavior of certain 900 line services has discredited the industry, but as with any business, there's the good and the bad.
As for "lonely teenagers," I do offer my services indiscriminately, within the allowance of the law and ethics.
"He insists that we are not
humans, but 'computer generated
The above a fabrication, as my reference to "clones" was not literal, but rather a description of how programmed the mind is of a person who believes the doctrines of a cult.
There's a statement in an applet at the bottom of what may be viewed with a NETSCAPE browser, that I, supposedly, encourage children to look at pornography. That's another lie.
The alleged "pornography" he referred to is this. The dictionary defines "pornography" as something which is intended to sexually arouse, and it is commonly known as explicit graphic illustration, either by photographs, drawn pictures, or the written word. To contend that this was pornography is ludicrous.
As for bigotry, what is it that Walsh and his group are fighting for? There are no USENET rules to prevent them from shouting bigoted ideas and lies about people on the INTERNET, but they and other fanatics are being exposed for that activity by myself and others. It is because of my efforts to expose them that these lies about me are so prevelant on the INTERNET.
These people have a favorite method of attempting to prove the other person wrong, and that is to lie about them, so that, supposedly, people believe what the person had written must have been wrong.
Three examples of bigotry from this CULT:
Following is from the keeper of the above mentioned site:
Jon 'Big Dave' Walsh
Wed, 23 Jul 1997 05:12:06 GMT
Organization: SKEP-TI-CULT® Administration,
LOO-NI™ Disruption Unit
BDK -- Is this his e-mail address? Can it be that
he is so obsessed with me "bdk"
that it's "bdkweave"?
Why thank you, Jon, I am so honored: "bdkweave"
Jon Walsh writes:
So, I got a hold of a psychic
advertised on his site. It turns
out that this man didnt' even work
for Bru anymore. How ethical.
The above statement is a lie. The person had not refused to take any business from me, nor had he asked for his name to be removed.
True/False Prophet of the SKEP-TI-CULT®
CULT® Administration Officer #01-22112-324
The above is from Jon's "signature."
On July 21 1997 Jon 'big dave' passed more lies on to
the general USENET audience, making his dishonesty
Before you begin to take Bru seriously,
you should know that he is balancing an
the brink of sanity. This man was laughed
at by Art Bell, a man who swallowed such
events as "Mel's Hole" and the "Lizard Lady"
with ne'er a chuckle. <snip>
He quotes me out of context, or misquotes me altogether. The above statement about being "laughted at by Art Bell," is a lie. Jon Walsh's writing of me on the WEB and USENET indicates an obsession with me.
The reference to a laugh, supposedly at me, is ridiculous. This page shows why.
Jon Walsh shows an obvious inability for
rational thought processes in the
I sent out a repeat of an old post I'd found to be witty and interesting, about Astrology. Obviously, the post had no reference to Jon Walsh, nor was it a criticism of anyone. I wrote the comment, in the post, that it was an old post being repeated.
Subject: Re: (NO) Scientific Evidence for Astrology
Date: 17 Dec 1996 11:55:05 -0700
Antibiotics: have resulted in the creation of diseases so powerful that antibiotics no longer work against them. In short, antibiotics may destroy the human race.
Astrology: has helped millions of people throughout history and continues to do so, giving people greater insight into themselves and the world around them.
You pick the winner.
NOTE: In context, the above is much more interesting and witty.
I am shortening it to make a point. The reader my
access www.dejanews.com for the complete text.
Subject: Re: WALSH a loser-irrational nutcase
From: Jon 'Big Dave' Walsh <email@example.com>
Date: Sept. 29, 1997
Bruce Daniel Kettler wrote:
> Bruce Daniel Kettler <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> was: Re: Astrology a Winner (repeat post)
> now: WALSH a loser-irrational and nuts
> >Jon 'Big Dave' Walsh email@example.com wrote:
> >> This is weird, Bruce just spent half a post trying to discredit me
> >> because many of my quotes were from a long time ago.
> Your quotes were of me, attempting to discredit me <snip>
> [with the use of] your distortions and lies about those
> posts from long ago. [BDK correction of his own grammar]
I answered further:
> Here, I've placed a post, a quote of someone about astrology. It
> was nothing like what you had written.
[The subject matter was of Astrology, not criticisms - BDK}
> To again show how irrational you are, which comes through clearly
> with your inability to even COMPREHEND what logic means, I
> posted something here from a long time ago, but it was nothing
> like what you had posted.
Following "assessment" of my comments from Jon Walsh:
> <snip> Not quite the high logic we'd expect from an idiot of
> your caliber. Must know you're beat.
The above statement indicates his
inability to see his own lack of logic,
even after an opportunity had been given
to evaluate his own writing.
Dr. Jon 'Big Dave' Walsh, BsD [obviously not a "Dr." of anything
real except "bs"]
True/False Prophet and Fearless Leader
To clarify further, we see in the following, what the statements Jon had made: his misrepresentations of my posts from so long before.
The rational reader will see, clearly, the difference between my criticism of his use of my old posts to say I'd been a "bad man," and my repost of comments about Astrology.
Subject: Re: Nonsense, Lies, and sick WALSH
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 1997 07:58:01 -0500
alt.paranormal (and other newsgroups)
(BDK's writing revised by BDK, and comments added)
I, BDK, wrote:Another lie. I never "got mad" at anyone for telling me there was no spaceship following hale-bopp. I'd never written there was.Jon Walsh wrote:Hmmm...I guess those posts that were in all capital letters calling people as*****s and jerks and telling them to go to hell were nice posts? Spaceship boy.The above, another lie about my writing on USENET, supposedly because I'd found people disagreeing with my ideas of HALE-BOPP. The only reason I've been uncivil on USENET, was because others had lied about me, or had written nasty remarks.A lack of honest here also. Bruce was a main proponent of the aliens trailing hale-bopp theory.The above, again, is an obvious lie as I'd only written that it was the theory of another person, Dr. Courtney Brown, a professor at a major university. That's does not place me in the category of a "proponent."
Here, I quote myself, a comment of Jon's
writing of me from long ago:
"No, all you have shown, here, through your
digging up posts from a year ago, is that
I change." [my crossposting rules-as
USENET itself changes]
Walsh had quoted my subject headers as follows:
> 1 WWW site $9. MO
> 1 We set up your WWW site
> 1 YOUR WEB SITE 9/MO
> 1 Your WWW ad & PIC
> 1 Your WWW site/we set up
...and, of course, my comment was:
"Yes, I've had that on the net. How long ago
was that? And, since it was so long ago, why
are you writing about it now? If there was a
problem with it, in your mind, and it was last
week, or even last month, then I could see some
sense to your writing about it now."
So, Jon's attempt was to discredit me by writing that I supposedly did something I'd just pointed out should not be done.
According to this "thinking" of Jon, the astrology post equated to the same type of writing that I'd criticised in the above writing:
"...since it was so long ago, why
are your writing about it now."
Prior to the above, Jon Walsh's months of silence on USENET had been broken by the initiation of ranting against me, with no
prior provocation from me.
For full quotes of posts: http://www.deja.com
To find all my past posts, click here.
So, you can see from these examples, INTELLIGENT LIFE
ON THE NET is difficult to find.
The Newsreader FORTE AGENT has a capability for screening all writing out, except for a select few.
You can actually select to read the writing of certain authors, and automatically screen out the rest.
You may also read all but certain writers.
Only the postings that you want to read are placed in your computer memory, and you can read and respond while not connected to the INTERNET.
The above is a perfect way to avoid wasting time with UNintelligent life on the Net. You can rely upon our force of cesspool sifters to help you know who to allow into your USENET world.
Stay tuned to our series for a longer, more complete, list in the future, but for now, your recommended allow to read list is:
Bruce Daniel Kettler
firstname.lastname@example.org (a "skeptic"
worthy of your
(there are more, read posts
and decide who they are)
Now and then, a "skeptic" will post in paranormalnewsgroups, and make sense, be honest, and civil. That is seldom, and certainly worth mentioning.
Enter into your FORTE AGENT, newsreader: author:email@example.com with your "add watch filter" and "retrieve body immediately" commands. At the bottom of your list, have a "kill" for "author: *" and "subject *" -- which "kills" all messages except those you want to retrieve. This feature only works in the paid-for version of FORTE AGENT.
Comments about these pages? Send E-mail
So, as you can see, from these examples, INTELLIGENT LIFE ON THE NET is difficult to find.
Click here for part -- 2