Del Robert Mulroy Page 6
by Dan Kettler
This part of the page is about the "shameful truth." I will not tell you what it is, but "about" it, and that means it was a question that Del Mulroy would not answer publicly, though asked repeatedly to in the newsgroups. See the DEJA archives, along with other pages in this series, and investigate for yourselves.
He had told so many intimate secrets: his arrest, his being beaten, his finding friends on the INTERNET because he could not find any in the town he lived in, and his suicide attempts.
However, he would not answer this question about what the charges were in connection for the arrest he wrote so much of, how he'd been beaten while in custody, and had 2 weeks endured a lack of medical attention.
What of the alleged "shameful lie" that Del Robert Mulroy calls it? More about the "lie" on this page.
The following is an edited Dec. 2000 statement from Mulroy, with comments from Amos Keppler and myself:
From: Dan Kettler <email@example.com>
Newsgroups: alt.astrology, alt.paranormal, news.admin.net-abuse.usenet, alt.magick
Subject: REPLACING CANCELLED POST The TRUTH about activities on USENET
vs lies <was> Re: Teen Gets Suspended From School For Casting Spell On Teacher
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 21:21:10 GMT
aka Del Robert Mulroy
DK: I am responding to this falsehood for one reason. Usenet
DK: is a public forum, in which liars are writing lies, and
DK: for the public interest I am telling the VERIFIABLE truth.
DK: Consider this a public service message.
> X-No-Archive: Yes
> Amos Keppler wrote:
> > Three years ago this was a real interesting discussion
> > forum. We were discussing the paranormal. Even though
> > there was some who didn't believe in it, they weren't
> > cock sure of themselves and abusive. In other words,
> > real discussion was taking place.
THE POINT ABOVE, REWRITTEN IN SIMPLER FORM FOR YOU, MULROY:
It's okay, with Amos, for others to be
skeptical in alt.paranormal.
The deceptive spin of MULROY:
In the alt. format, anything goes and
that means skeptics are on topic as well.
DK: However, I never wrote anything different, nor did Amos, but you
like to rewrite what others write, all the time. See /mulroy.html
DRM: I have been here since December 06, 1994 and
I have witnessed this place every single day since.
DK: That might be so, but you have been without
posting for long periods.
DRM: Skeptics are blamed religiously by those who are defending the
forum with their lives screaming and ranting one flame war at
a time and that has always been the case since about
DK: There is a vast difference between a skeptic
and a pseudo-skeptic-fanatic.
PSF pseudo-skeptic-fanatic =
DK: Fact is, paranormalists and astrologers DEFEND
themselves against FREAKS!
DK: Fact is, there is NET CENSORSHIP AND TERRORISM (NCAT)
brought about by PSEUDO-SKEPTIC-FANATICS (PSF)
NET CENSORSHIP AND TERRORISM (NCAT)
The following is pure BS from MULROY:
...the numbers of those involved in the flame wars have
increased over the years with them provoking the skeptics
and insist on the flame wars.
DK: Your writing, as usual, is nonsense. Paranormalists
don't "provoke." For the most part, the PSF
MULROY: ...your mysterious absence following a mugging from the
resident people here.
DK: Amos leaves all the time. It has nothing to do with "mugging."
MULROY: There are just a few believers in the paranormal left.
DK: And, that is evidently because of the activities of
PSF. It's not because of me. It's not because of
Flagship. It's not because of Amos. It's not because
DK: We all stop posting for months at a time, and this nonsense
goes on, from PSF, discouraging believers from posting.
MULROY: Haunter having joined the group has been a
very good asset to the team here of regulars.
DK: Haunter is a denigrating liar, like you Mulroy.
DK: See DEJA for past posts to and from Haunter...
DK: Much like you, he has little confidence in the natural
spiritual order of things, and his spiritual outlook,
according to his posts, are rather pessimistic.
AMOS: The "sceptics" are ruling the ground virtually unopposed.
DK: The statement below is really getting the stink, in here,
rather deep. You are so full of sh*t your eyes are brown.
MULROY: ...it is unfortunate that these people feel they have
to try and drive skeptics from the forum.
DK: Where, when, how? We don't even try to drive
PSF from any forum.
DK: The facts, as contrasted to the lies are here...
MULROY: I have no problem talking with any skeptics at all.
DK: You lie about and denigrate all those who expose them.
MULROY: ...those who oppose the skeptics use tactics [proven to fail]
and [they] have done nothing but disrupt this place over
DK: This is all garbage from a garbage mind.
DK: The disruption comes from deranged fanatics. You help
them. When you help them, of course you have no "problem"
AMOS: Through henhouse tactics and various intimidation-techniques
they've pushed away almost any opponent to their rule. Only
those with the thickest of hides among the paranomal contigent
DK: Exactly. See NCAT url reference above.
> > The name alt.paranormal has long since become redundant.
> > alt.pseudo-sceptic-fanatics fits a lot better.
> > Amos the Great
DK: Exactly. However, if one abandons the newsgroup to them, they
go on to other newsgroups occupied by believers. Here's one
example of a proven DOCUMENTED history of that...
MULROY: ...They [skeptics] are interested in the paranormal and they
are interested in discussing issues.
DK: The overwhelming majority of those posting _as_
"skeptics" in a.a. and a.p. are not interested in
discussing issues. They wish to CONTROL THESE
NEWSGROUPS, and they do so with intimidation
tactics and censorship.
DK: They do all that NEWS ADMIN forbids, like FLOODING NEWSGROUPS.
DK: See DEJA for past posts from me regarding NEWSGROUP FLOODING.
DRM: > They will not tolerate lies and insults for very long
DRM: > which a few here insist on doing as the only way of
DRM: > communicating with those big bad old evil skeptics
DRM: > who won't leave alt.paranormal.
Mulroy, you know the lies and insults come FROM PSF. I don't
"lie" about them. I tell the DOCUMENTED, and PROVEN TRUTH about
them, both ON and OFF the net.
ON THE NET http://www.psicounsel.com/discsens.html
OFF THE NET http://www.psicounsel.com/takstock.html
Sure, we insult them, but that's usually in the form of rebuttal.
It's usually a denigrating lie from them, met with the truth about
them from us.
Psychics, Astrologers, UFOs,
Mysticism and the Newsgroups
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
page 7 page 1